The Permanent Income Hypothesis: Evidence from Ghana

Authors

  • Sherif Abdul Rahaman Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46545/aijefr.v2i2.227

Keywords:

Consumption, Income, Permanent Income.

Abstract

This study aims to test the validity of the PIH for Ghana using aggregate annual data of GDP per capita and household consumption expenditure per capita from 1971 to 2017. The data used were taken from UN statistics. The PIH holds that the income a consumer expects to persist throughout his or her life is what determines their consumption. Earlier studies have shown that the PIH implies the magnitude of the revision in permanent income arising from innovation in the income process is proportional to the magnitude of the revision in consumption arising from the same innovation. This study tests this implication. Innovation in the income process here is the part of the income process that could not be forecasted. The study generates the innovation in the income process by estimating an ARMA model for income and then estimates a consumption equation by OLS using the consumption variable and the generated innovation in income variable. The study finds that the magnitude of the revision in permanent income arising from the innovation in income is larger than the magnitude of the revision in consumption resulting from the same innovation. This implies consumption response to changes in income is smaller than what the PIH predicts. This result is taken as evidence that the PIH does not hold for Ghana.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Sherif Abdul Rahaman, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Turkey

    Department of Economics

    Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Turkey

References

Campbell, J. Y., & Mankiw, N. G. (1989). Consumption, income, and interest rates: Reinterpreting the time series evidence. NBER macroeconomics annual, 4, 185-216.

DeJuan, J. P., Seater, J. J., & Wirjanto, T. S. (2006). Testing the permanent-income hypothesis: new evidence from West-German states (Länder). Empirical economics, 31(3), 613-629.

Friedman, M. (1957a). A Theory of Consumption Function. Princeton University Press.

Friedman, M. (1957b). The Permanent Income Hypothesis. In A theory of Consumption Function (pp. 20-37). Princeton University Press.

Flavin, M. A. (1981). The adjustment of consumption to changing expectations about future income. Journal of political economy, 89(5), 974-1009.

Hall, R. E. (1978). Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Political Economy, 971-987.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory Of Employment Interest rate and Money.

Lunfang, D., Khan, K., Khan, I., & Khan, N. H. (2018). Testing the empirical validity of permanent income hypothesis and absolute income hypothesis for China. The Empirical Economics Letters, 17(4), 453-460.

Roche, M. J. (1995). Testing the Permanent Income Hypothesis: The Irish evidence. The economic and social review, 283-305.

Shintani, M. (1996). Excess Smoothness of Consumption in Japan. Japanese Economic Review, 271-285.

Souleles, N. S. (1999). The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax Refunds. The American Economic Review, 947-958.

Statistics, U. T. (2018). HS 2002 Classification by Section.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-25

Issue

Section

Original Articles/Review Articles/Case Reports/Short Communications

How to Cite

The Permanent Income Hypothesis: Evidence from Ghana. (2020). American International Journal of Economics and Finance Research, 2(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.46545/aijefr.v2i2.227